Industrial/Military IP


Industrial Design

According to the International Council of Societies of Industrial Design, industrial design is the central factor technological innovation and the catalyst for economic exchange.  The aim of industrial design is to “establish the multi-faceted qualities of objects, processes, services and their systems in whole lifecycles.”  When applied to patent law, the purpose is to protect the intellectual property rights of the inventor in both domestic and international arenas. 

The Hague Agreement Concerning the International Deposit of Industrial Designs provides a single mechanism for filing industrial designs amongst participating nations.  While over fifty parties have agreed to these terms, noticeable exceptions include both China and Brazil.  Both countries have varying degrees of industrial design patent protection rights, but patent infringement continues which has made foreign investment a perilous affair.

According to “IP Strategy” by Robert Pitkethly, firms must develop external and internal intellectual property strategies in order to protect their intangible assets.  External strategies include licensing and litigation where the former permits the use of intellectual property while the latter seeks to stop infringement.  The best strategy will depend largely on the judicial protocol regarding intellectual property statutes of the country the patentee is operating within.  Internal strategies involve valuation, information, coordination, and education. The industrial design must be worth the cost of pursuing the industrial design patent and the risk of informing other parties by means of public filing.  The coordination of resources such as legal experts and licensing managers also incurs additional expense.  Lastly, the educating all staff of the dangers of compromising valuable intellectual property is also of paramount importance.

Military Design


According to “Intellectual Property Rights: Innovation, Governance And the Institutional Environment” by Birgitte Andersen, in the past century half of the world’s science and technology (S&T) and research and development (R&D) innovations and inventions were performed conceived due to defense related initiatives.  Large superpowers, such as the United States, were usually penned as having a Military-Industrial Complex that led to the constant creation of new technologies fueled by defense needs. During the cold war, IP systems were created in secrecy and the design of these new technologies were largely left classified to the public because the government created these technologies internally. However, as the cold war ended, the United States has led the effort to integrate military and civilian technology through outsourcing of research, development, services and production to Private Military Corporations. These corporations span different continents and have led to dependencies of different countries on other’s for military technology. Recently, Europe has recognized its over-dependence on the United States for technology and has developed a European Research Area under the European Union to help foster innovation and protect IP for military design in Europe.

This website provides current issues, country specific strategies, patentability requirements, definitions, and legal actions concerning industrial and military design protection for the Brazil, China, and the United States.  Please feel free to peruse the following country specific tabs to learn more.


Sources:

IP Strategy” by Robert Pitkethly